HomeGlossaryRe-Bidding / Re-Tendering
Evaluation & Award

Re-Bidding / Re-Tendering

The relaunch of a procurement process from scratch after all bids are rejected, a serious irregularity is found, or a complaint is upheld, resetting the competition with a new solicitation.

Quick answer

The relaunch of a procurement process from scratch after all bids are rejected, a serious irregularity is found, or a complaint is upheld, resetting the competition with a new solicitation.


Re-Bidding or Re-Tendering is the relaunch of a procurement process after the original competition is cancelled or found to be procedurally invalid, requiring the buyer to issue a new solicitation and start the evaluation sequence again.

What is Re-Bidding / Re-Tendering?

Re-Bidding occurs when a procurement process cannot be completed as originally run. Common triggers include: all bids being rejected as non-responsive or above budget; a bid-protest-complaint being upheld that invalidates the evaluation; a finding by the financing bank that the process was not conducted in accordance with its rules; or a material change in the project scope that makes the original solicitation documents no longer fit for purpose.

Re-Bidding is more disruptive than simply amending the original solicitation, because it requires a new notice, a new bidding period, and a fresh evaluation. The procurement clock resets, which delays the project and increases the buyer's administrative burden. MDB-financed procurement subject to prior-review requires the bank's approval before re-bidding, since the decision to reject all bids and restart is itself a significant procurement action.

For bidders who were eliminated in the first round, a re-bid is a second opportunity. For the first-round winner who was displaced by a successful bid-protest-complaint, a re-bid can be deeply disruptive. It is important to distinguish re-bidding from cancellation-of-procurement, where the buyer stops the process permanently without restarting.

Why Re-Bidding / Re-Tendering matters for bidders

Monitor the procurement portals of organisations where you bid regularly, because re-bid notices are sometimes issued without a prominent link to the original tender. If you were eliminated in a previous round, a re-bid gives you the chance to correct your approach. Review the original solicitation documents alongside the new ones: buyers often revise specifications, evaluation criteria, or time lines when re-bidding, and these changes tell you what went wrong in the first round. In competitive markets, the re-bid attracts different participants, so your competitive position can shift materially from the original competition.

FAQ

Are re-bids always publicly advertised?

Yes. A re-bid is a new procurement process and must be advertised through the same channels as the original, including any general procurement notice requirement. Quiet or restricted re-bids that skip the public notice step are a procedural breach.

Can the buyer change the evaluation criteria when re-bidding?

The buyer can revise the solicitation documents for a re-bid, including the technical specifications and evaluation criteria, as long as the revised documents are published with adequate time for bidders to prepare. Any changes that fundamentally alter the nature of the procurement may require additional justification under the financing agreement.

Does re-bidding reset the standstill period?

Yes. A re-bid produces a new evaluation and a new award-recommendation, which triggers a new standstill-period before the new contract can be signed.

How Bidovate helps

Bidovate puts Re-Bidding / Re-Tendering to work inside your capture and proposal workflow.

Track re-launched tenders in your sector

See Bidovate in action

Book a demo and we will show you the platform using your actual contract data.